Alleged kidnapper Evans now charged with murder
Lagos state government yesterday filed a fresh charge of murder and attempt to commit murder against billionaire kidnap kingpin Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike popularly known as Evans.
It will be recalled that Evans had earlier been arraigned at an Ikeja High Court charged with kidnapping where he pleaded guilty but has now changed his plea to not guilty.
Two separate charges were subsequently filed against him at a Lagos High Court, sitting in Igbosere In the first charge, Evans was accused alongside one Victor Aduba on a four-counts charge of conspiracy, kidnapping and unlawful possession of firearms. They were accused of conspiracy and kidnapping one Mr Sylvanus Hafia.
In the second charge, Evans was accused with three other defendants — Joseph Emeka, Chiemeka Arinze, and Udeme Upong of a seven-count charge bordering on murder, attempt to commit murder, attempt to kidnap and sale and transfer of firearms. The kidnap kingpin however filed a motion on notice asking the court to quash the two separate charges containing 11 counts filed against him arguing that the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against him.
Arguing the motion, Evans' counsel, Mr Olukoya Ogungbeje told the court that his application was brought pursuant to Section 55 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State 2015 and Sections 36 (6) (b) of the 1999 Constitution. He said in the first charge which contained four-counts, “the first and second counts which border on alleged kidnapping, constituted gross abuse of court’s process because the defendant had been charged with same offence before Justice Hakeem Oshodi in Ikeja. “We are saying, even if there are different victims on same offence, why can’t the prosecution bring the charge together for same judge to hear and determine.” Ogungbeje also brought the issue of counts three and four, bordering on unlawful possession of firearms, saying that there was repetition of same offence on both counts.
He argued that “unlawful possession of firearms which the defendants were being tried for is a federal offence which should be prosecuted by the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF). “We have checked through the court’s processes to see if there is a fiat from the AGF, authorising Lagos State to prosecute a federal offence, there is none,” Ogungbeje said. He also argued in the same manner regarding the second charge which bordered on seven-counts charge of murder, attempt to commit murder, attempt to kidnap and sale and transfer of firearms. Ogungbeje said counts one, two and three were based on murder, adding that before murder could be sustained, there must be evidence to prove that someone was killed.
He contended that, “in the proof of evidence before the court, there is no police investigation, a forensic evidence or a documentary evidence to buttress these points”. Ogungbeje also said counts four and five were based on kidnapping which the defendants have been charged with, thereby making the charge repetitive. He also said that counts six and seven were based on same sale and transfer of firearms, describing it as repetitive and duplicitous. “We are submitting that the charge is an abuse of court process and is prejudicial to the defendants”, he submitted Other counsel representing the other defendants, Mr Emmanuel Ochai, and Ogedi Ogu, however, with the submissions of Ogungbeje.
However, Ogu, who represented the third defendant, Chiemeka Arinze, asked the court to remand the defendants in prison to enable Arinze get medical help. The Prosecutor, Ms. Titilayo Shitta-Bey, however, urged the court to dismiss all the arguments made by the defendant’s counsel. She said that there was no abuse of court process in the way the case was instituted because a count should contain only one offence. She said that the co-defendants in the case, the time and place the offences were committed should also be taken into cognizance while drafting a charge. The offences were committed in different places," he said
Evans
It will be recalled that Evans had earlier been arraigned at an Ikeja High Court charged with kidnapping where he pleaded guilty but has now changed his plea to not guilty.
Two separate charges were subsequently filed against him at a Lagos High Court, sitting in Igbosere In the first charge, Evans was accused alongside one Victor Aduba on a four-counts charge of conspiracy, kidnapping and unlawful possession of firearms. They were accused of conspiracy and kidnapping one Mr Sylvanus Hafia.
In the second charge, Evans was accused with three other defendants — Joseph Emeka, Chiemeka Arinze, and Udeme Upong of a seven-count charge bordering on murder, attempt to commit murder, attempt to kidnap and sale and transfer of firearms. The kidnap kingpin however filed a motion on notice asking the court to quash the two separate charges containing 11 counts filed against him arguing that the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against him.
Arguing the motion, Evans' counsel, Mr Olukoya Ogungbeje told the court that his application was brought pursuant to Section 55 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State 2015 and Sections 36 (6) (b) of the 1999 Constitution. He said in the first charge which contained four-counts, “the first and second counts which border on alleged kidnapping, constituted gross abuse of court’s process because the defendant had been charged with same offence before Justice Hakeem Oshodi in Ikeja. “We are saying, even if there are different victims on same offence, why can’t the prosecution bring the charge together for same judge to hear and determine.” Ogungbeje also brought the issue of counts three and four, bordering on unlawful possession of firearms, saying that there was repetition of same offence on both counts.
He argued that “unlawful possession of firearms which the defendants were being tried for is a federal offence which should be prosecuted by the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF). “We have checked through the court’s processes to see if there is a fiat from the AGF, authorising Lagos State to prosecute a federal offence, there is none,” Ogungbeje said. He also argued in the same manner regarding the second charge which bordered on seven-counts charge of murder, attempt to commit murder, attempt to kidnap and sale and transfer of firearms. Ogungbeje said counts one, two and three were based on murder, adding that before murder could be sustained, there must be evidence to prove that someone was killed.
He contended that, “in the proof of evidence before the court, there is no police investigation, a forensic evidence or a documentary evidence to buttress these points”. Ogungbeje also said counts four and five were based on kidnapping which the defendants have been charged with, thereby making the charge repetitive. He also said that counts six and seven were based on same sale and transfer of firearms, describing it as repetitive and duplicitous. “We are submitting that the charge is an abuse of court process and is prejudicial to the defendants”, he submitted Other counsel representing the other defendants, Mr Emmanuel Ochai, and Ogedi Ogu, however, with the submissions of Ogungbeje.
However, Ogu, who represented the third defendant, Chiemeka Arinze, asked the court to remand the defendants in prison to enable Arinze get medical help. The Prosecutor, Ms. Titilayo Shitta-Bey, however, urged the court to dismiss all the arguments made by the defendant’s counsel. She said that there was no abuse of court process in the way the case was instituted because a count should contain only one offence. She said that the co-defendants in the case, the time and place the offences were committed should also be taken into cognizance while drafting a charge. The offences were committed in different places," he said
Comments
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: The comments on the blog are the views and opinions of the readers and does not represent that of Confluence Reporters.